John Mahama Criticizes Judiciary; Raises Concerns Over Ghana’s Democracy
Former President John Mahama has renewed his criticism of Ghana’s judiciary, questioning its independence and alleging a deterioration of state institutions. During a tour of the Northern Region, Mahama shared his disappointment, suggesting that Ghana’s governance model has veered off course, diminishing its standing as a democratic example in Africa.
“Ghana, once a beacon of democracy, has become a bad model,” Mahama asserted. He went on to highlight what he perceives as systemic challenges, including a judiciary he believes lacks true independence, and a struggling economy.
Mahama’s remarks come against the backdrop of a legal standoff between Effutu MP Alexander Afenyo-Markin and Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin. The Supreme Court recently stayed Bagbin’s declaration of four parliamentary seats as vacant, prompting Bagbin to file a counterclaim arguing that the Court had overstepped its jurisdiction. This case has fueled discussions around judicial reach and the separation of powers in Ghana’s political system.
Mahama’s critique of the judiciary is consistent with his recent calls for constitutional reform. In July, he promised to restart the constitutional review process, with a particular focus on capping the number of Supreme Court justices, currently unrestricted. His position contrasts with Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo’s recommendation to add five more justices to the bench, which Mahama argues requires constitutional oversight.