Connect with us

News

Supreme Court Judges Using Dictionary To Rule Instead Of Statutes

Published

on


Judges in Ghana are to enforce statutory laws like the Evidence Act, however, the seven Supreme Court justices sitting on the election petition, were on Tuesday captured quoting Black’s Law Dictionary which is about English Common Law and does not refer to statutes in Ghana.

This happened when, the judges once again unanimously ruled out President John Dramani Mahama’s application to reopen the election petition to enable his lawyers subpoena the chairperson of the Electoral Commission (EC), Jean Adukwei Mensa.

The EC boss, a public officer, had refused to speak to the numbers she declared as the votes obtained by the various presidential candidates in the 2020 Presidential election and Supreme Court judges as well as President Akufo-Addo, the beneficiary of the disputed election, had through his lawyers surprisingly argued in support of the EC boss’ decision.

One lawyer The Herald spoke to on the matter explained that Dictionaries would give broad definitions sometimes relying on cases which may have been decided by foreign courts relying on foreign legislation.

He went on saying: “When a local law defines something, you don’t go looking for the same definition from a dictionary. You apply the local law. I think the resort to Black’s Law Dictionary was to avoid applying the local legislation which may not support the position that the court had taken.”

Another lawyer mentioned that the judges should have focused on the Evidence Act 1975 and referred to section 72 and not the black dictionary.

Evidence Act 1975, section 72 on adverse witness in a civil action states that;

(1) Subject to the discretion of the Court, in a civil action a party, or a person whose relationship to a party makes the interest of that person substantially the same as a party, may be called by an adverse party and examined as if on cross-examination at any time during the presentation of evidence by the party calling the witness.

(2) Where the witness is cross-examined by the lawyer of that witness or by a party who is not adverse to the party with whom the witness is related, that examination shall be treated as if it were a re-examination.

Soon after the ruling, Mr Tsikata announced to the court that he was struck by the fact that the Supreme Court judges will rely on the Black Law dictionary and ignore Evidence Act 1975, but there was no comment from the judges.

The legal team of John Dramani Mahama in his ongoing Election Petition, says the Supreme Court’s ruling not to allow him to reopen the case over the thorny matter of getting the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission into the witness box to testify and gets cross-examined through a subpoena application, was wrong.

The decision means that the 2020 victory of President Akufo-Addo, who boasts of writing the NPP 1992 stolen verdict against the late Jerry John Rawlings victory in that year’s election, remains tainted and of dubious validity as the returning officer has refused to speak to her numbers which she several times changed.

According to Dr. Dominic Ayine, one of the spokespersons of Mr Mahama, the petitioner, the apex court used wrong legal premises in ruling on the matter.

Dr. Ayine made this known while interacting with the media after the court hearing on February 16, 2021.

He said, although his team is disappointed with the ruling, they are bound to respect it.

“This morning the Supreme Court gave a ruling in respect of our motion to reopen the petitioner’s case. That motion was filed a few days ago with a view to having the opportunity to reopen our case and have the chairperson of the EC, Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa testify in our case. We wanted her to come and testify as an adverse witness which is allowed under the rules.”

“It was our strategy to serve a subpoena on her since she has decided not to give a testimony even after filing a witness statement. But the Supreme Court has given a decision in which it basically said she’ll not be compelled to testify. In our view, the court was wrong and the reasons of the court were based on wrong legal premises, but the Supreme Court is the final decision maker when it comes to the law in the country, and we are bound by what it has said.”

The Supreme Court on Tuesday, turned down a request by Mr Mahama, flagbearer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), to have Jean Mensa, cross-examined through a subpoena application.

Lead counsel for Mahama, Tsatsu Tsikata had earlier described Jean Mensa as a hostile witness for deciding not to testify in the election petition case.

Mr Tsikata, who had earlier closed his client’s case had wanted it reopened after the Supreme Court upheld the decision by the first and second respondents – the EC and President Akufo-Addo – not to call any witness.

He also was seeking a decision from the court to subpoena Jean Mensa in case the application to reopen his client’s case was upheld.

The justices of the Supreme Court explained that Jean Mensa cannot be tagged as a hostile witness because she had not yet mounted the witness box in the ongoing case.

The Supreme Court subsequently rejected Mr Tsikata’s request for the case to be reopened and also to have Jean Mensa put in the witness box.

The justices of the apex court indicated that the petitioner failed to meet the threshold for which leave can be granted for a party to reopen their case to adduce further evidence.

“A witness who has not yet entered the witness box to testify cannot, therefore, be called an adverse or hostile witness under any circumstance. The petitioner has not demonstrated to us in any way that the decision of the respondents not to testify which was upheld by this court in its ruling on February 11, 2021, has occasioned any miscarriage of justice,” Chief Kwasi Anin-Yeboah read on behalf of the seven-member Supreme Court panel on Tuesday, February 16, 2021.

“The rules permit a party to call or not to call a witness who has filed a witness statement to testify, as the mere filing of a witness statement does not constitute an election to testify as we rightly held in our ruling on February 11, 2021. Again, the petitioner did not decide to close his case after the testimony of his third witness just because the chairperson of the first respondent has filed her witness statement.

This is because, in law, a plaintiff or petitioner does not require evidence from his or her adversary in a system like ours to prove his or her case… The plaintiff or the petitioner succeeds on the strengths of his or her own case and not the weakness of his or her adversaries’ case.”

Meanwhile, Mr Tsikata, says his team filed for a review of the court’s ruling that upheld the decision of the EC Chairperson not to testify in court.

The petitioner has also served notice of filing for a stay of proceedings.

The Supreme Court had earlier ordered the lawyers in the case to file their closing addresses by Wednesday, February 17, 2021.

Source: The Herald

Advertisement

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Twitter Reacts To Kojo Oppong Nkrumah’s Rejection By The Appointments Committee

Published

on


Information Minister-designate, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, jumped to the top spot of social media trends last night after he was rejected by the Appointments Committee of Parliament.

Information indicates that the nominations of Oppong Nkrumah, Hawa Koomson and Dr Owusu Afriyie Akoto have been rejected by the committee after their vetting.

The reports state that Oppong Nkrumah was rejected because some committee members believe he was dishonest with his answers on some key issues.

One issue that cost him outright disapproval was his connection with television station MX24.

It is believed that while Oppong Nkrumah denied any affiliation with the media house, some members of the committee are firm in their conviction that he is the owner of the company.

His role in the contempt charge of former Deputy Attorney General Dominic Ayine by the seven justices of the Supreme Court sitting on the 2020 election petition has also been cited as a reason for his rejection.

Below are some reactions from Twitter to the news about Mr Nkrumah’s Rejection.

Source: GhanaWeb

Continue Reading

News

Appointments Committee Has No Power To Reject Any Ministerial Nominee – Kweku Baako

Published

on


Abdul Malik Kweku Baako, the Editor-in-Chief of the New Crusading Guide newspaper has opined that the Appointments Committee of Parliament cannot have the final say in the approval or disapproval of any of the ministerial nominees.

According to him, the Appointments Committee can only recommend to the plenary about which nominees to approve or disapprove and the final decision must be made “by consensus or majority decision by the plenary”.

Commenting on a Facebook post by US-based Ghanaian lawyer Stephen Kwaku Asare aka Kweku Azar, who suggested that the disapproval of Kojo Oppong-Nkrumah by the Appointments Committee, which Kweku Azar thinks the Majority of the plenary should reverse, Baako wrote: “but the Appointments Committee does not and cannot have a final say relative to the approval or disapproval process per the Standing Orders! It can only recommend approval by consensus or majority decision by the plenary.

Baako added: “My research findings (so far) show that it is/was on only one occasion that it “unanimously” recommended outright disapproval/rejection of a nominee to the plenary. Even then, some amendments had to be effected on the Committee’s report at the plenary. “De jure no. De facto yes” notwithstanding! Respectfully!!”

The Appointments Committee of Parliament has disapproved President Akufo-Addo’s candidates of ministers-nominee for Food and Agriculture, Information and Fisheries, namely Dr Owusu Afriyie Akoto, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, and Hawa Koomson, respectively, according to sources that cite Asaase Radio 99.5FM.

Source: GhanaWeb

Continue Reading

News

Gov’t Can Use The Coronavirus Vaccine To Eliminate You – Pro NDC Group, ASEPA Cautions Bagbin

Published

on


The Executive Director of the Alliance for Social Equity and Public Accountability, Mensah Thompson has cautioned the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin to ensure the safety of the coronavirus vaccine before he takes it.

According to Mensah Thompson, the Speaker must allow his personal physician to access the safety of the vaccine before he takes it.

The ASEPA boss believes that the government cannot be trusted since they did everything possible including chewing of ballot papers to prevent Bagbin from becoming speaker of parliament.

“If I were the Speaker of Parliament until my personal physician certifies my vaccine shot I am not taking it. I cannot even accept a bottle of water from the very people who chewed ballot papers just to make sure I wasn’t elected as Speaker, how much more a vaccine shot.” Mensah Thompson of ASEPA wrote.

Source: GhanaFeed.Com

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics15 hours ago

I Will Never Join NDC Again Even If My Suspension Is Lifted – Allotey Jacobs

Allotey Jacobs, former Central Regional Chairman of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) says he never return to the party even...

Election 20202 days ago

Mahama Was Asking The Supreme Court To Ignore The People’s Will Because Of An Error By The EC – Gabby Otchere Darko

Senior Member of the governing New Patriotic Party, Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko, says former President John Dramani Mahama’s election petition goes...

Politics2 days ago

Supreme Court Will Tell Us Next Week Whether The Dead Goat Is Lost – Koku Anyidoho Subtly Mocks NDC Again

A former Deputy General Secretary of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Koku Anyidoho has said that by next week, the whole country will know...

Politics4 days ago

Video: Renowned Musical Evangelist, Diana Asamoah Prophesies Victory For Alan Kyerematen?

Celebrated Evangelist Diana Asamoah has been cited in a video footage which has since gone viral on social media in which the...

Election 20205 days ago

I Was The Best Man At Dr. Ayine’s Wedding – EC Lawyer, Amenuvor Shows Support At Contempt Trial

Lead Counsel for the 1st Respondent in the Election Petition hearing, Justin Amenuvor, has shown solidarity to colleague Lawyer Dominic...

Election 20205 days ago

Election Petition Final Address: EC Admits It Made Errors In Final Declaration

The lawyers of the Electoral Commission (EC), first respondent in the ongoing petition hearing say it is unfortunate that they...

Politics5 days ago

If The People Of SALL Had Voted, They Would Have Voted For Me – Amewu

Hohoe lawmaker, John Peter Amewu has asserted that his votes would have increased if eligible voters of Santrokofi, Akpafu, Likpe,...

Election 20205 days ago

Mahama’s Petition Is So Weak, It Shouldn’t Have Been Heard – Akoto Ampaw’s Final Address To The Supreme Court

Lawyers for President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo have prayed the Supreme Court to dismiss the Petitioner’s case as it discloses no reasonable...

Election 20206 days ago

Election Petition: Another Error Discovered In Tsikata’s Closing Address To The Supreme Court

What was supposed to be a petition challenging an alleged error in the declaration made by the chairperson of the...

Election 20206 days ago

Order A Re-run Of Election 2020 Because Jean Mensa Refused To Explain ‘Changing Figures’ – Tsikata Tells Supreme Court

Lawyers for the petitioner in the on-going election petition has charged the Supreme Court to  rule in favour of John...

Business

Business7 days ago

Hobort Shipping Now Delivers Items from Ghana to the U.S.A

Hobort Shipping, a global shipping service headquartered in Accra, Ghana, has taken a mega step forward, introducing a new service...

Business2 weeks ago

From Local To Global: Find Out About Hobort Shipping Services, The Ghanaian Shipping Company That Is Shipping Packages Affordably To Any Part Of The World

Shipping of goods and packages has become very essential especially in the modern world. With the advent of online shopping...

Business1 month ago

MTN Supports Africa’s Coronavirus Vaccine Effort With US$25 Million

Africa’s leading mobile network MTN has announced a donation of US$25 million to support the African Union’s COVID-19 vaccination programme. The donation will help...

Business3 months ago

Sujimoto’s Banana Island Project To Be The Next Downtown, Dubai

“You buy ‘a property’ when you want to be somebody, but you buy a LeonardoBySujimoto when you are already someone”...

Business4 months ago

SIJIBOMI OGUNDELE: How I Run Sujimoto Construction; My Story: From Agege to Ikoyi, How to Make Nigeria and Its Youths Great

Avant-garde, debonair, futuristic, and innovative is among the traits that describe the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Sujimoto...

Business4 months ago

Police Withdraw Criminal Case Against Alhaji Sinare

The Ghana Police have withdrawn a criminal case against the National Vice Chairman of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC),...

Business5 months ago

Sub-Saharan Africa Has No Choice Than To Stick To Fossil Fuel-Dr Babajide Agunbiade.

As the world is drifting towards the use of renewable energy to power their economies, sub-Saharan Africa has no choice...

Business5 months ago

African Construction Giant, Sujimoto Clinches Time Tech Award

Sijumoto, Nigeria’s leading luxury Real Estate brand has won the just concluded Time Tech Award, a prestigious continental award organised...

Business6 months ago

4% Reduction In ‘Talk Tax’ Takes Effect Today

Mobile subscribers and data users will from Tuesday, September 15, 2020, enjoy longer durations of voice and data bundles but...

Business6 months ago

African Construction Giant, Sujimoto Explains 400% ROI In Two Years Offer

Sujimoto Construction CEO, Sijibomi Ogundele, has said that 400% return in 2 years for investing in LeonardoBySujimoto is real, describing...

Trending