Election 2020
How Can Questions You Say Are Irrelevant Be Asked In Cross-examination – Tsikata Clashes With Supreme Court Judge
Lead Counsel for petitioner John Dramani Mahama, Tsatsu Tsikata quizzed why the Supreme Court would refuse to grant their request for interrogatories on grounds that they were irrelevant and yet state that these same questions could be asked during cross-examinations.
He made the pronouncement when he was arguing for their application for review for the case of interrogatories which was dismissed by the court a few weeks ago, to be granted.
The Apex Court on January 19, 2021, dismissed the application by the petitioner.
Former President John Mahama was seeking permission to elicit answers to some 12 interrogatories from the Electoral Commission.
The petitioner among other questions were asking the EC to answer if the National Communications Authority (NCA) played any role or facilitated in any way, the transmission of the election results to its headquarters.
On Thursday, January 27, 2021, lawyer Tsikata attention was drawn to the fact that he would get the opportunity to ask these question during cross-examination.
But he responded by saying the judges have said that interrogatories under common law is discretionary, respectfully the interrogatories were not brought to you under common but under rule 22 of CI 47.
“If you say the interrogatories were dismissed because it wasn’t relevant and you say it can be asked during cross-examination, respectfully how can irrelevant questions be accepted during cross-examination?”
Source: RainbowRadio
Election 2020
Blame Yourself For Not Doing Your Work Properly In The Strong Room – Supreme Court Chastizes Kpessah Whyte And Mettle-Nunoo
The justices of the supreme court have told witnesses of Mr John Dramani Mahama in the election petition, Mr Rojo Mettle Nunoo and Dr Michael Kpessa-Whyte to blame themselves for abandoning their duties in the strong room during the final collation of the election results if their claims are to be believed.
During proceedings, the two witnesses told the court that they were sent by the Chair of the Electoral Commission (EC) to Mr Mahama at the time of the collation of the final results in the strong room. In their absence, the results were then announced.
Delivering the judgment on Thursday, March 4 the court said “…Notwithstanding all these allegations of misunderstandings with the chair of the 1st respondent in the strong room and the fact that they were absent during the declaration, they did not give any indication as to how these happenings in their absence affected the final results announced by the 1st Respondent.
“The testimonies would have carried some little weight if the purpose of the petition was to change entries made on the collation forms or summary sheets but that is not the case.
“Their testimonies were therefore of no relevance to the said issues set out for determination and so we find them unworthy for consideration whatsoever.
“In fact, regarding the testimonies of PW2 and PW3 , if their evidence is to be believed then they had to blame themselves for abandoning their post at the national collation centre at the time the verification and certification of the results were ongoing and PW3 had then verified and certified the regional collation results out of the 16.”
Source: GhanaFeed.Com
Election 2020
Breaking News: Supreme Court Unanimously Dismisses Mahama’s Petition As Having No Merit
The 7-member panel of the Supreme Court hearing the 2020 election petition have dismissed the 2020 election petition brought before the court by flagbearer of the NDC for the 2020 elections, John Dramani Mahama.
In an extensive verdict read by Chief Justice Kwasi Anin Yeboah, the court was of the opinion that the petitioner failed to disclose how the so-called errors by the EC chair materially affected the declaration.
More Soon….
Source: GhanaFeed.Com
Election 2020
Supreme Court Update: Mahama In Court As Judges Get Set To Pronounce Their Verdict
The Petitioner in the 2020 election petition, John Dramani Mahama has made an appearance at the premises of the Supreme Court this morning.
The 7-member panel presiding over the 2020 election petition is expected to deliver judgement today in the case which lasted about one month.
Mr Mahama is challenging the declaration of President Akufo-Addo as having won the 2020 election.
According to Mr Mahama, no candidate obtained more than 50%.
He is therefore praying the court for a re-run of the election between himself and President Akufo-Addo.
The Apex Court will put the matter to rest today by delivering its judgement.
More Soon……………
Source: GhanaFeed.Com
-
News9 months ago
I’m Only Resting At the Hospital– Ghana’s Health Minister Denies Having Contracted COVID-19
-
Breaking News9 months ago
Breaking News: Npp Parliamentary Aspirant For Effiduase Asokore Brutally Beaten By Soldiers
-
News9 months ago
Transfer Health Minister to Dormaa Hospital For Him to Enjoy Ghana’s Real Healthcare System–A Plus
-
News9 months ago
Ghana’s Health Minister Tests Positive For Coronavirus
-
News9 months ago
REPORT: Mayor for Sekondi-Takoradi-Kobina Sam Dies of Coronavirus
-
Politics9 months ago
NPP Primaries: Delegates Refuse Bribe After Being Asked To Swear By ‘Antoa’ Deity
-
News9 months ago
COVID-19: New E.I Sets 10-Year Jail Term For People Who Fail To Wear Face Masks
-
News9 months ago
See How Kanazoe Road Has Badly Deteriorated Just 4 Years After the Mahama-Ford Scandal